<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/charges-against-actionscript-3.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.insideria.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.insideria.com,2009://34/tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25236-</id>
  <updated>2009-11-05T20:02:49Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Charges Against ActionScript 3.0 Poll (http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/charges-against-actionscript-3.html)</title>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.21-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25236</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/charges-against-actionscript-3.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.oreilly.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=34/entry_id=25236" title="Charges Against ActionScript 3.0 Poll" />
    <published>2008-07-24T12:15:46Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-28T20:23:27Z</updated>
    <title>Charges Against ActionScript 3.0 Poll</title>
    <summary>Last week&apos;s article named &quot;The Charges Against ActionScript 3.0&quot; by Colin Moock was one of our most popular posts on InsideRIA and it brought out a lot of passion from the Flash/ActionScript community. 

As a followup, we would like to know which of the charges raised in this piece do you most agree with?</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Rich Tretola</name>
      <uri>http://blog.everythingflex.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Blogs" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.insideria.com/">
      <![CDATA[<div class="ap_r_front"><a href="http://digitalmedia.oreilly.com/images/oreilly/digitalmedia/2007/12/actionscript3.jpg" class="highslide" onclick="return hs.expand(this)"><img src="http://digitalmedia.oreilly.com/images/oreilly/digitalmedia/2007/12/actionscript3.jpg" alt="Actionscript 3" title="Click to enlarge" width="148"/></a></div>Last week's article named "<a href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/the-charges-against-actionscri.html">The Charges Against ActionScript 3.0</a>" by Colin Moock was one of our most popular posts on InsideRIA and it brought out a lot of passion from the Flash/ActionScript community. 

<p>As a followup, we would like to know which of the charges raised in this piece do you most agree with?</p>

<p>A <a href="http://oreillynet.com/insideria/polls/index.csp">new poll</a> has been created allowing you to cast your vote. If you haven't already commented on the article (over 70 of you already have) or even if you have, I encourage you to <a href="http://oreillynet.com/insideria/polls/index.csp">cast your vote</a> as I am sure your feedback will be something that Adobe is very interested in seeing. </p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25236-comment:2019213</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25236" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/charges-against-actionscript-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/charges-against-actionscript-3.html#comment-2019213" />
    <title>Comment from Will on 2008-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Will</name>
        <uri>http://www.ahrooga.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ahrooga.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yes this is a brilliant article. I just wish I could vote on more than one of the issues :P</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-24T13:30:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25236-comment:2019214</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25236" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/charges-against-actionscript-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/charges-against-actionscript-3.html#comment-2019214" />
    <title>Comment from jacob on 2008-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>jacob</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>a none option would be nice too</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-24T14:45:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25236-comment:2019215</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25236" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/charges-against-actionscript-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/charges-against-actionscript-3.html#comment-2019215" />
    <title>Comment from Rich Tretola on 2008-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rich Tretola</name>
        <uri>http://blog.everythingflex.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.everythingflex.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Jacob, your wish is our command. A "none" option has been added.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-24T15:12:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25236-comment:2019225</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25236" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/charges-against-actionscript-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/charges-against-actionscript-3.html#comment-2019225" />
    <title>Comment from Adnan Doric on 2008-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Adnan Doric</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Well, I would like to vote for Preloader bug in Flex 3 (Flex 2 probably too) :</p>

<p>When using "#" in URLs, the preload doesn't show :)</p>

<p>It is surprising to note that while in the same time they preach deep linking.</p>

<p>Priceless !</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-24T18:05:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25236-comment:2019238</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25236" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/charges-against-actionscript-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/charges-against-actionscript-3.html#comment-2019238" />
    <title>Comment from Saeed Ashour on 2008-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Saeed Ashour</name>
        <uri>http://blog.alflash.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.alflash.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Done</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-24T19:32:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25236-comment:2019296</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25236" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/charges-against-actionscript-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/charges-against-actionscript-3.html#comment-2019296" />
    <title>Comment from flash guy on 2008-07-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>flash guy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>seriously? vote on your favorite? I thought this was going to be useful...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-26T18:11:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25236-comment:2019313</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25236" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/charges-against-actionscript-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/charges-against-actionscript-3.html#comment-2019313" />
    <title>Comment from Rich Tretola on 2008-07-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rich Tretola</name>
        <uri>http://blog.everythingflex.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.everythingflex.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>flash,</p>

<p>you don't think it is important for Adobe to know which issues are the largest and where they would best focus their efforts in future releases of Flash?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-27T13:09:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25236-comment:2066780</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25236" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/charges-against-actionscript-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/charges-against-actionscript-3.html#comment-2066780" />
    <title>Comment from kevin on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>kevin</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Colin also has a video with Jim Cobert that talks about the Flash Player from the FITC Toronto. Some good talks about some of the current bugs in Flash and how they are trying to deal with <a href="http://www.hostseeq.com/c/domain_registration.htm ">domain names</a><br />
.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-23T10:07:16Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed
