<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/javafx-preview.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.insideria.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.insideria.com,2009://34/tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25312-</id>
  <updated>2009-11-16T15:37:16Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for JavaFX Preview (http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/javafx-preview.html)</title>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.21-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25312</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/javafx-preview.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.oreilly.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=34/entry_id=25312" title="JavaFX Preview" />
    <published>2008-07-31T14:30:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-31T17:58:41Z</updated>
    <title>JavaFX Preview</title>
    <summary>Sun Microsystems releases a new preview of the JavaFX SDK available to everyone.</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard Monson-Haefel</name>
      <uri>http://www.curl.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="News &amp; Events" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.insideria.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Sun Microsystems just <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/073108-sun-releases-preview-of-javafx.html">announced</a> the release of the <a href="http://www.javafx.com/">JavaFX</a> preview today moving the JavaFX platform out of a controlled beta into a more publically accessible venue. JavaFX is packaged with the NetBeans IDE version 6, which is actually a pretty good idea in my opinion.  There are a set of tutorials you can use to help get started.</p>

<p>On a personal  note, Although <a href="http://www.curl.com">Curl</a> is my RIA platform of choice I'm pretty excited about JavaFX. I've been a long time Java developer and wrote my first Java applet in 1995. Like many people I had to move the server-side Java to maintain my sanity and career but I've always wished that Java had been more successful on the client. Perhaps JavaFX will accomplish that ... time will tell.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25312-comment:2019472</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25312" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/javafx-preview.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/javafx-preview.html#comment-2019472" />
    <title>Comment from Richard Monson-Haefel on 2008-07-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard Monson-Haefel</name>
        <uri>http://www.curl.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.curl.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Just spent an hour playing around with JavaFX - its not very Java like, which is fine, but folks who are looking forward to using it because its more like Java may be disappointed. </p>

<p>The NetBeans support for JavaFX is very beta.  I'll look forward to the next candidate release which hopefully be a bit more stable.  If you are looking forward to diving in to JavaFX this release is the first chance many of us have but I would recommend waiting for something a bit more stable.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-31T17:14:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25312-comment:2020951</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25312" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/javafx-preview.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/javafx-preview.html#comment-2020951" />
    <title>Comment from Chui on 2008-08-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Chui</name>
        <uri>http://www.redmountainsw.com/wordpress/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.redmountainsw.com/wordpress/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I too have been playing with it. Who do you think the sweet spot for JavaFX will be? </p>

<p>a) Existing Java apps who are starting to look stale because of WPF? or<br />
b) is it a genuine competitor in the web space?</p>

<p>Memory consumption is pretty bad. I don't hold high hopes for much improvement in v 1.0<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-22T10:51:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25312-comment:2020957</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.insideria.com,2008://34.25312" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/javafx-preview.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.insideria.com/2008/07/javafx-preview.html#comment-2020957" />
    <title>Comment from Richard Monson-Haefel on 2008-08-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard Monson-Haefel</name>
        <uri>http://www.curl.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.curl.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Well, lets keep in mind that its a work in progress. I expect JavaFX to improve a lot between now its final release, but I wouldn't use it for production systems until then - or until after the first couple of point releases.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-22T13:27:23Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed
